Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Rage Bait

Today, I will go a bit off topic. I believe this is an important topic to consider when utilizing social media and other internet tools. This morning I listened to a podcast by Youtuber Dasia Sade addressing how corporate media purposely frames messages in a negative or offensive way to profit from the anger of those who consume content. "Rage Content" also known as "Rage Baiting" is a tactic journalists and media creators use to attract attention to their content. In the book "The Rhetoric of Outrage: Why Social Media is Making Us Angry", the author notes that Forbes Journalist, Helen Popkins wrote, "Anger is the most viral emotion on the Internet". When a person sees something that outrages them, they are very likely to share it with others. That anger and offense is likely to stay with them throughout their day. Social media, particularly Facebook, are major vehicles in the distribution of rage bait. Social media platforms and news sources don't always vet or disclose all of the details of a situation when utilizing this tactic. Quite often, they will create an outrageous or deciving titles and headlines - quite often with a negatively suggestive photo to attract attention. Many people stop here and come to their own conclusion regarding the situtation and fail to read the full article for details. In many cases, the article is either vague with inconclusive details or is completely opposite to what the title and photo suggest. The person is decieved and misinformed about the situation in question. Another risk to this practice is this; it often perpetuates stereotypes. Some common stereotypes in recent years include: People who are politically conservative are racists. Liberals are overly sensitive 'snowflakes'. Black people are criminals. Middle Eastern and Hispanics are terrorists. Millenials and Gen Z are lazy and refuse to work. All of these stereotypes are not at all true 100% of the time, yet these are the types of narratives rage bait uses to attract attention. Combine these messages with the algorithms of social media- especially Facebook, the messages become amplified. Social media selects the content seen based on the individual's viewing and engagement patterns. If a person views or comments on a post that utilizes negative language about a particular group, they will see more of that kind of post. The system has then identified that kind of post will keep the person coming back to the platform. Therefore, the more the person sees and thinks that message, the more they believe it. That is how stereotypes and prejudices are continued. To break this cycle, it is important that people do not react to rage bait articles and to fact-check them. Find credible journals and news sources that and have a neutral bias. These will be the most reliable and factual than politically scewed sources. Dasia Sade pointed out that biased news sources often have blind spots. There are important news and events they will not acknowlegde because it does not fit their narrative. So, if you consume content from onlky one source, you will not get the full story. To be a well-informed people, we need to learn how to identify rage bait and stop reacting and sharing it. We need to look at it with a very crtical eye and to determine if this is the truth or if the writer is trying to manipulate the reader and their emotions.

2 comments:

  1. Hello Aya,

    We've been learning how powerful the hive mind can be to solve problems and expand knowledge. What you've mentioned here with rage baiting is, unfortunately, how politicians and companies can quickly summon the hive with no real goal of finding a solution other than building publicity and taking priority in the algorithm. Instead, rage-baiting makes us all just angry enough that we feel that we must comment to address the hate and inequality expressed in such posts.

    The key is to give just enough information so that anybody supporting a particular side feels like they are in the right. I've seen simple posts that have spiraled out of control because two sides bring in all their hate from their own experiences to comment on something. Ex. A video of a cyclist running into a car. Whose fault is it? People who drive cars and have had accidents with cyclists will all chime in. People who cycle and have accidents with cars will also say their piece. Not all the information exists, but people have already decided who's at fault because of their previous experiences and ideologies.

    Sadly, so much time and effort go into these posts that exist solely to make somebody more money and give them more power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I've had similar experiences as well. One time, I posted a couple of articles to my Facebook page regarding current events. I didn't make any comments on them. I just posted the articles. A lady I've never talked to or met saw one of the articles and went through my Facebook page commenting and 'angry' reacting on my posts. On one she said "It's your fault! You put us in this mess!" I replied back, "Hun, I wasn't in office lol." She went on for a couple of days. I replied back to her, welcoming a calm discussion to understand her point of view and to point out some concerns I had. She eventually messaged me thanking me for not being hostile and angry.

    This is something that I try to explain to people that I know. The media wants people to be angry and constantly arguing. It doesn't help anyone. It doesn't get anyone's point across, it doesn't make anyone feel better about themselves or their relationships. However, it does help the media companies get views and help their bottom line.

    ReplyDelete

Week 11 Reflection

This week I have been focusing on the Produsage project. I decided to create a Facebook group designed to support dance students as they pro...